| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Terminal Insanity
Minmatar
Foundation
   |
Posted - 2010.09.30 15:24:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: kasiloth
What i want to say here is that the tactic of an enemy to send a stealth bomber in a system staying there afk for hrs preventing local miners or raters to work is becoming a curse with a high risk to ruin the entire game.
You are clear evidence that this tactic is infact improving the game, by clearing out sackless derps such as yourself.
Grow a pair and mine anyways. Get some combat support to protect you. You want to sit in 0.0 space all day and mine without worrying about others, you are playing the WRONG GAME.
~ ° ° ° ~
Non-Gameplay Enhancements! |
Terminal Insanity
Minmatar
Foundation
|
Posted - 2010.09.30 15:57:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Mrs Destruction
removing local would unbalance the game terribly unless you extended the D scan to encompass more of the system 
If theres one good thing that came from wormhole space, its the proof that removing local would NOT unbalance the game. Infact, wormhole space is superior 0.0
IMO Change the directional to automatic so we dont have to keep clicking it.
Shorten its range, to compensate for its automagicness
REMOVE LOCAL.
This would change gameplay a lot, but it would also be a bit more interesting...
~ ° ° ° ~
Non-Gameplay Enhancements! |
Terminal Insanity
Minmatar
Foundation
|
Posted - 2010.09.30 16:20:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Razor Vision
I really dont think the hardcore understand how removing local in kspace would rip the game apart. It works for WH space because the select few who choose to live that way do so. But not everyone wants to be living that way and there never will be a lot of ppl wanting that. Therefore you'd have a sharp decrease in miners the moment local is removed and as a result a sharp increase in prices for every thing in the game save for items sold by NPC's. (skillbooks and station vaults, lol).
it would -not- rip the game apart. You're a sensationalist.
You bring up the point "not everyone wants to be living that way" well, tell that to the kiddies who cry for cloak nerfs every day.
Every time i hear about the cloak whiners, im always reminded of this guy...
~ ° ° ° ~
Non-Gameplay Enhancements! |
Terminal Insanity
Minmatar
Foundation
|
Posted - 2010.09.30 16:45:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Venkul Mul
They have been nerfed, don't you remember?
i got 150 MILLION units of tritanium from 2 hauler spawns.
Nerfed?
~ ° ° ° ~
Non-Gameplay Enhancements! |
Terminal Insanity
Minmatar
Foundation
|
Posted - 2010.09.30 17:22:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Terminal Insanity on 30/09/2010 17:25:19
So lets see here...
1) "High security" space provides your security, so you really do not care if theres an AFK cloaker in the system.
2) In 0.0 space, you have no concord. Due to the lack of concord, you have to suddenly worry about the AFK cloaker.
3) 0.0 Space is also supposed to be player-driven.
4) There is another thread somewhere, players want to take the role of Concord in Jita.
Well, heres an idea
1) Man the **** up.
2) Create your "concord" wannabie alliance/corp/whatever.
3) Guard all these carebears in 0.0.
4) ???
5) Profit?
Edit: oh wait, sorry, i missed the part where you want to just bear in 0.0 as if it was highsec and not take any added costs OR risks. Continue moaning.
~ ° ° ° ~
Non-Gameplay Enhancements! |
| |
|